Industrial Revolution Era from Legal View in Indonesia In Relation to Business Competition 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/icesst.v3i1.390Keywords:
Business competition, Industrial revolution, lawAbstract
Industrial Revolution 4.0 is revolutionizing the movement of the world economy. If you don't prepare yourself from now on, you will be far behind in the economic world. Government intervention in monopoly and oligopoly markets aims to influence prices, the quantity produced, and the distribution of income from economic activities. Intervention is carried out in 2 ways, namely: regulation and legal anti-monopoly. In this research, the recommendation is that the government must be able to make regulations that encourage the development of the digitalization economy as a strategy. Such as easy policies in financing startup businesses, tax incentives and guidance for SMEs. The government also needs to increase the development of telecommunications infrastructure in small areas so that it can minimize the imbalance that occurs.
References
Abdul R. Saliman, 2014, Hukum Bisnis Untuk Perusahaan Teori dan Contoh Kasus, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group
Amirudin & Zainal Asikin, 2008, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Bambang Sunggono, 2005 Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Burhan Ashshofa, 2010 Metode Penelitian Hukum,Jakarata: Rineka Cipta C.S.T. Kansil,SH. & Christine S.T. Kansil, SH., Mh, 2009, Seluk Beluk Perseroan
Terbatas Menurut Undang-Undang No.40 Tahun 2007, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Edward Iacobucci, The Interdependence of Trade and Competition Policies, World Competition 5, 1997
Johnny Ibrahim, Business Competition Law, Philosophy, Theory and Implications of Its Application in Indonesia, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2006
Michael Parkin, Economics, 6th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., Boston. Chapter 17, 2003
Rhido Jusmadi, Concept of Business Competition Law (History, Free Trade Rules and Merger - Acquisition Regulations), Setara Press, Malang, 20Merit E Janow, Private and Public Restrains that Limit Access to Markets, in
Market Access After The Uruguay Round: Investment, Competition and Technology Perspectives, 1996
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.