Pakpak Architecture, A Study of Local/Traditional Architecture for Architect Licensing in North Sumatra

Authors

  • Peranita Sagala Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/icesst.v3i2.434

Keywords:

Traditional architecture, North Sumatra architect, license

Abstract

Traditional architecture in North Sumatra is very diverse. There are eight types of traditional houses in North Sumatra, and each tribe also has a diversity of traditional architecture. This research summarises the diversity of local architecture, especially traditional Pakpak architecture in North Sumatra, to be used as a guide in the application of architect licensing in North Sumatra.The method used is literature study and sorting out aspects of architecture that are important to understand. These aspects are historical background, settlement patterns, building types, ornaments and examples of their application. From this research, it was found that there is a lack of scientific literature documenting traditional Pakpak architecture in North Sumatra. It is hoped that this research will encourage further research into traditional architecture which is still very under-researched.

References

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1978). Sejarah Sumatera Utara. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Nasution, J. (2018). Jurnal sejarah. Pengurus Pusat Masyarakat Sejarawan Indonesia, 1(2), 65–83.

Republik Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2017 tentang Arsitek.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 15 Tahun 2021 tentang turunan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2017 tentang Arsitek.

Saleh, M. (1988–1989). Arsitektur tradisional Sumatera Utara. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Wahid, J., & Alamsyah, B. (2016). Arsitektur & sosial budaya Sumatera Utara. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Peranita Sagala. (2024). Pakpak Architecture, A Study of Local/Traditional Architecture for Architect Licensing in North Sumatra. The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST), 3(2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.55606/icesst.v3i2.434